TL;DW:
[1440p Average] “So across 16 games tested, the 9070 XT saw on average a 9% improvement with the latest game and driver updates. In comparison the 5070 Ti saw just a 2½% improvement.”
Steve Walton from Hardware Unboxed.
4K results shows the 5070 Ti and the 9070 XT performance matching neck and neck.
On review day the 5070 Ti was 2% faster, but now the 9070 XT is 3% faster than the 5070 Ti.
With the 9070 XT being $150 CAD or ~30% cheaper (in US and AU) than the 5070 Ti, the 9070 XT wins out in being the better value buy.
I don’t see the number of runs stated anywhere. Still would be pretty unlikely to get the exact same results, and even more still for a 9070 to perform exactly the same as a 5070
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]
No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
No Let’s Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates.
(Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources.
If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)
Is that based on the assumption that the numbers come from single runs instead of averages of multiple runs?
I don’t see the number of runs stated anywhere. Still would be pretty unlikely to get the exact same results, and even more still for a 9070 to perform exactly the same as a 5070
So HU are fudging the numbers to favor …?
I’m not making any claims except that these first several results look extremely suspect