genAI apologists are so similar in mentality to the police bootlickers that regurgitate police news statements as if they’re the truth.
Krafton is lying to you and just because you saw them throw in an “ethical AI” buzzword you fell for it because you’ve been conditioned to be gullible and politically neutral when it comes to worker exploitation in the industry.
They’ve been caught ethicalwashing their Stable Diffusion use as being “an in-house proprietary model”. SD is the farthest thing possible from “ethical” genAI (it’s inherently an oxymoron anyways).
Here is them on YouTube boasting about how many workers they can lay off now that they’ve adopted outsourced exploited labor from outside artists for free.
So you believe an ethical AI cannot exist no matter what, you accuse me of being a police bootlicker, gullible, and neutral to worker exploitation, and I am supposed to respond to this in good faith? Sorry, not going to take your bait and engage in a flame war with you, after all it is rule 1 here.
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]
No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
No Let’s Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates.
(Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources.
If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)
genAI apologists are so similar in mentality to the police bootlickers that regurgitate police news statements as if they’re the truth.
Krafton is lying to you and just because you saw them throw in an “ethical AI” buzzword you fell for it because you’ve been conditioned to be gullible and politically neutral when it comes to worker exploitation in the industry.
They’ve been caught ethicalwashing their Stable Diffusion use as being “an in-house proprietary model”. SD is the farthest thing possible from “ethical” genAI (it’s inherently an oxymoron anyways).
Here is them on YouTube boasting about how many workers they can lay off now that they’ve adopted outsourced exploited labor from outside artists for free.
https://www.thegamer.com/i-have-mixed-feelings-about-inzois-use-of-generative-ai/
So you believe an ethical AI cannot exist no matter what, you accuse me of being a police bootlicker, gullible, and neutral to worker exploitation, and I am supposed to respond to this in good faith? Sorry, not going to take your bait and engage in a flame war with you, after all it is rule 1 here.