Steam doesn’t want to pay arbitration fees, tells gamers to sue instead
arstechnica.com
external-link
Valve previously sued a law firm in attempt to stop mass arbitration claims.

Valve Corporation, tired of paying arbitration fees, has removed a mandatory arbitration clause from Steam’s subscriber agreement. Valve told gamers in yesterday’s update that they must sue the company in order to resolve disputes.

The subscriber agreement includes “changes to how disputes and claims between you and Valve are resolved,” Steam wrote in an email to users. “The updated dispute resolution provisions are in Section 10 and require all claims and disputes to proceed in court and not in arbitration. We’ve also removed the class action waiver and cost and fee-shifting provisions.”

I hate that gamers have been so Stockholmed by Steams monopoly that they think this is a good thing.

Imagine if it was Ubisoft forcing customers to go through the courts.

Create a post

Sub for any gaming related content!

Rules:

  • 1: No spam or advertising. This basically means no linking to your own content on blogs, YouTube, Twitch, etc.
  • 2: No bigotry or gatekeeping. This should be obvious, but neither of those things will be tolerated. This goes for linked content too; if the site has some heavy “anti-woke” energy, you probably shouldn’t be posting it here.
  • 3: No untagged game spoilers. If the game was recently released or not released at all yet, use the Spoiler tag (the little ⚠️ button) in the body text, and avoid typing spoilers in the title. It should also be avoided to openly talk about major story spoilers, even in old games.
  • 1 user online
  • 2 users / day
  • 14 users / week
  • 189 users / month
  • 1.38K users / 6 months
  • 1 subscriber
  • 1.34K Posts
  • 14.4K Comments
  • Modlog