A test of AI for Australia's corporate regulator found that the technology might actually make more work for people, not less.

Maybe we just need a different type of NLP to work with summarization. I have noticed before LLMs are unlikely to escape their ‘base’ knowledge.

☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
creator
link
fedilink
24M

That’s very likely the case. LLMs sucking up all the air in ML research right now, and we shouldn’t be using them as a hammer for every problem.

Create a post

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

  • 1 user online
  • 40 users / day
  • 139 users / week
  • 305 users / month
  • 2.32K users / 6 months
  • 1 subscriber
  • 3.01K Posts
  • 43.4K Comments
  • Modlog