AI is fine if it’s used in the beginning-middle of a process. For example, if a writer has to write some dialogue, they know the basic content of the dialogue, feed that into GPT, that gives them a rough draft. Now many companies want to just make that the end of the process, and that’s really despicable. But if then the writer is able to go through and edit and proofread that draft until it’s basically all in their own words anyway, then the AI was just a labour saving device to create some basic structure from the outline.
I’m okay with them, if used responsibly. For example, AI generated settings could be very interesting, being able to expand games in ways we haven’t seen. However, I would like to see the original artists brought in and compensated for that work.
Having NPCs have real generated dialog could be amazing. But those voice actors should be compensated fairly.
Don’t blame the tech itself. The greed that’s driving it absolutely, but as a consumer I’ll say I’ll gladly put my money to games who use it responsibly
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]
Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)
Posts.
News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
No humor/memes etc…
No affiliate links
No advertising.
No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
No self promotion.
No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
No politics.
Comments.
No personal attacks.
Obey instance rules.
No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc…)
Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.
My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.
I want games to have labels that they use AI generated assets. So I can avoid them.
AI is fine if it’s used in the beginning-middle of a process. For example, if a writer has to write some dialogue, they know the basic content of the dialogue, feed that into GPT, that gives them a rough draft. Now many companies want to just make that the end of the process, and that’s really despicable. But if then the writer is able to go through and edit and proofread that draft until it’s basically all in their own words anyway, then the AI was just a labour saving device to create some basic structure from the outline.
I’m okay with them, if used responsibly. For example, AI generated settings could be very interesting, being able to expand games in ways we haven’t seen. However, I would like to see the original artists brought in and compensated for that work.
Having NPCs have real generated dialog could be amazing. But those voice actors should be compensated fairly.
Don’t blame the tech itself. The greed that’s driving it absolutely, but as a consumer I’ll say I’ll gladly put my money to games who use it responsibly