The Internet Archive created a program they called “Controlled Digital Lending” (CDL) – where a physical book is scanned, turned into a digital file, and that digital file is then “loaned” out to people on the Internet. In 2020, The Internet Archive removed what few restrictions existed with this Digital Lending program, allowing an unlimited number of people to download the digital copy of a book.
That was incredibly dumb. It’s just baffling that they didn’t run this by a lawyer or even a highschooler. They put all their good work in jeopardy for what exactly?
I still believe that serious hoarders who want to ensure other can access it should try to do so anonymously. IPFS, torrents, or something like eMule over I2P would be the best solution for this. Then copyright lawsuits like these would be very very very difficult to do without de-anonymizing people.
The books they loaned are loaded with DRM though, which make it unusable after the loan period expires, so it’s not like they’re handing out unlocked pdf en-masse like z-library. They probably thought this restriction was good enough and publishers have enough goodwill to let it slide during the height of the pandemic.
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]
This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.
Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.
Rules:
1: All Lemmy rules apply
2: Do not post low effort posts
3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff
4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.
5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)
6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist
7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed
That was incredibly dumb. It’s just baffling that they didn’t run this by a lawyer or even a highschooler. They put all their good work in jeopardy for what exactly?
I still believe that serious hoarders who want to ensure other can access it should try to do so anonymously. IPFS, torrents, or something like eMule over I2P would be the best solution for this. Then copyright lawsuits like these would be very very very difficult to do without de-anonymizing people.
Anti Commercial-AI license
The books they loaned are loaded with DRM though, which make it unusable after the loan period expires, so it’s not like they’re handing out unlocked pdf en-masse like z-library. They probably thought this restriction was good enough and publishers have enough goodwill to let it slide during the height of the pandemic.
Some of the bigger publishers were okay with it for a month or so. It smelled like a setup then, still smells like a setup.
Since when do publishers have goodwill