I said the same thing about the original. The remake definitely wasn’t needed to improve the game because it’s still good looking and plays just like a modern game. But I did enjoy the remake regardless, moreso as an excuse to replay the original than as a new or improved experience.
Also gotta remember there is a whole generation of teenagers and adults now that were too young to play or appreciate these games when they first came out and most people aren’t interested in retro games. A remake may be the only way they’d ever experience it.
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]
No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
No Let’s Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates.
(Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources.
If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)
Imo the graphics of ds2 still hold up. So aside from bugs caused by new hardware it doesn’t need a remake.
I said the same thing about the original. The remake definitely wasn’t needed to improve the game because it’s still good looking and plays just like a modern game. But I did enjoy the remake regardless, moreso as an excuse to replay the original than as a new or improved experience.
Also gotta remember there is a whole generation of teenagers and adults now that were too young to play or appreciate these games when they first came out and most people aren’t interested in retro games. A remake may be the only way they’d ever experience it.