Ubisoft isn’t the victim here, consumers buying broken games are.

So what, you think they shouldn’t be reviewed bad for a broken game?

No, it’s broken and shouldn’t be for sale if they’re not going to fix it.

Guess what, as a mobile dev, my job is to fix the broken shit on multiple OSs as well. It’s the territory.

It’s almost like you can delist it in such a way you prevent people from paying money for a broken game with no intention of updating it again, and still leave it for people who currently have copies.

Wow that was such a garbage take.

Sure

But when people are replying to

https://lemm.ee/comment/17210238

Saying that anyone not calling out Microsoft is biased, is a bad take. And I’m not sure what your point of more context is needed?

A broken game gets negative reviews. I’m not sure what’s biased about this.

That yes, it doesn’t bother me that Ubisoft is a consumer of Microsoft.

If Ubisoft doesn’t update their product, they should be reviews negatively. If they don’t like it they should de list it so people don’t pay money for a broken product.

So, people should leave positive reviews for games that no longer work?

Like I get what your saying. It’s not Ubisoft’s fault.

But if they’re not going to fix their old game, than it should be reviewed negatively so people don’t spend money on a game that no longer works.

If they don’t want that, than delist it.

Companies aren’t people. So yes, my limit is “skin deep”.

(Not the person you replied to).

Yes,

I use arch BTW.

See it’s not about posting slop for slop sake. It’s so when the account become some kind of shill it has “legitimate” history to say they’re not a shill.

No…

You can’t buy a card without also buying all the individual composts though.

Except I’m buying a card with objectively worse materials.

If im not buying the cumulation of parts I don’t know what im buying.

Except your buying both….

So then why wouldn’t I expect a discount on this v2 card?

How is buying hardware based on specs not doing both?

To that end, that’s like saying apple doesn’t need to offer higher base specs on things like ssds and internal storage because the performance is the same.

No but I am paying for the accumulation of those parts no? Otherwise I’m not buying hardware.

And we know shoe on the other foot, if there was no performance increase, but a fancy marketing label, they’d be all over increasing the price for it.

It’s objectively worse. “Real world performance” might be the same, but I’m paying for performance AND parts.

If still expect a discount for worse parts.