theinspectorst

Liberal, Briton, FBPE. Co-mod of m/neoliberal

  • 2 Posts
  • 14 Comments
Joined 2Y ago
cake
Cake day: Jun 12, 2023

help-circle
rss

He did a great job with Burnley getting promoted from the Championship. But then they got immediately relegated from the Premier League, finishing 19th out of 20 (in a season where two of their relegation rivals took points deductions) and looking pretty out of their league most of the season. He’s falling upwards.


The club’s owners have invested a fortune in new players. But there’s a sense the squad has been assembled without a clear blueprint
fedilink

How is it ‘scripting’ when most of the games have tonnes of injury time? This is how they’re applying the injury time consistently to address the problem of time wasting etc at World Cups. They’ve been very transparent about this.

They’re taking the same approach in Premier League and EFL games this season. Sheffield Wednesday vs Southampton the other week had 15 minutes of injury time too.

Just accept you made a ludicrous argument and were wrong.


Those are the rules. 10+ minutes of injury time were pretty common at the men’s World Cup last year, even without interruptions for head injuries.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/63710986

It sounds like you may have really wanted England to lose and so you’re interpreting things through that lens.


Do you have to be a public figure to get on the ‘hostile’ list or are they accepting open applications? I’d like to join too please.


Only one game in and he’s already broken Alan Shearer’s Bundesliga scoring record!


Great pass, cool finish. It’s gone from Kane and Sonny, to Kane and Sané…



More than a sneaking suspicion for me - my base case is that Spurs aren’t a top 4 side. The only way I see them making it is if being back in the CL is such a wrench for Arsenal, Newcastle and Man Utd that their league form suffers badly. It certainly wouldn’t be the first time this had happened, but all three clubs are on paper better than Spurs and have been strengthening their squads over the summer.


Striker market is broken, market for English players is broken, and market for PL players is broken - and Kane ticks all three boxes.


I’m torn on whether Levy is right here. It seems crazy to let Kane go for free next summer when they can get this much money for him now. But I can’t see what proven PL or equivalent striker Spurs would be able to sign behind him, especially with no European football on offer.

I imagine Levy’s gamble is that Champions League qualification is worth more (the pure revenue plus whatever value Spurs put on the ability to attract better players) than what they’re being offered for Kane now, and that finishing outside the top 4 for the fourth time in five years would pose more fundamental problems for their footballing and financial outlook - so they might as well hold Kane now and roll the dice for a top 4 finish.




Btw - there’s an FPL community over on feddit.uk, but predictably there’s no activity there yet - hoping it picks up as the start of the season approaches.