Do you have a link for that?

They are mentally ill, unfortunately. I hope they get help soon.

It wasn’t an insult, you genuinely seem very ill and I hope you get better.

You also clearly do care

You dont sound healthy.

Based on his previous comments when he’s brought this up - he appears way, way more outraged than seems to make sense for what happened. From something 30 years ago.

But they specifically don’t appear to be talking about that

This guy just wants attention.

No they didn’t. Google doesn’t allocate money out of the Android phone sale for any of these services.

These services make money by making you the product. They don’t make money unless you use it.

I’m with you on not paying full price in general, but they answered your main question before and you didnt acknowledge it.

I think they mean it will never be PC only, so it’d be an infinite wait. Or maybe some future release version will be console only.

Also, “720p/30” lol

Ah, full expansion DLC. That’d be nice.

Oh

Yes

Hmmm, I hadn’t heard of Retrodeck before (or more likely, I forgot about it). How does it compare to Emudeck?

It doesn’t seem controversial at all. People seem to pretty consistently say your take sucks and that you’re wrong.

Ah yes. (Barf) GamePass.

Or a Steam Deck.

Announced at 2,499

…for a video card. Jesus.

Their parents should find something else for them to stare at mindlessly for hours

The fact that it’s made by essentially one guy is also just insane.

Like 98% of them, yes.

What is one of them lying about?

It seems like an article written purely about info in a documentary, with no original investigation (although I could easily see that they tried at least some, but no one answered)

Maybe there was some special or package deal, but no.

I was thinking more along the lines of “ah yes, that thing that happened 19 years ago”

…howso?

More like 850 at this point

Literally unusable!!!

Lack of security updates should be a concern to you, yes.

It’s nonsensical, so not really.

Not saying there weren’t bugs, but the consensus seemed to be that it was the most polished, bug-free title they’ve ever launched.

Edit: …which is a pretty low bar, I know. But it seemed more inline with the bugs that most “AAA” games tend to have at launch.

Hey, if it works it works.

But pretty damn hilarious.

Starfield…?

For all the complaints about Starfield, being Bethesda-buggy wasn’t really one of them. It was possibly their most polished release.

You answered a question with a good answer, just not to the question they aske. They asked about the comment - “it’s not the game we bought into at launch”. They were talking about how a lot of people complained that what the game was at launch wasn’t what had been advertised - what people “bought into”.

You seem to be explaining why it’s “not the game you bought at launch” - which is definitely a valid argument too, just to something else.

Thats not really an answer to their question, though.

Also I disagree :)

Oh god, so there is absolutely nothing they can ever do to make up for it, I guess. Even after like 10+ MAJOR updates and expansions over 6+ years for free, they can’t possibly ever do enough for some people, I guess.

Use rats as wig

Where?

I think 3 was, I guess it’s subjective though.

Maybe the base game of 2 had more features or something, and with 3 you needed add-ons