I wasn’t aware of the controversy, but I’m not surprised it’s yet another mess caused by the existence of the British empire.

I use a combo of lutris and proton, if you’re looking for keywords.

At least Linux isn’t trying to milk you for its own gain.

Omg, I feel sorry for the people cleaning up after those codebases later. Maintaing that kind of careless “quality” lines of code is going to be a job for actual veterans.

And when we’re all retired or dead, the whole world will be a pile of alien artifacts from a time when people were still able to figure stuff out, and llms will still be ridiculously inefficient for precise tasks, just like today.

https://youtu.be/dDUC-LqVrPU

How about demanding better tools?

Can a democracy that doesn’t reflect and can’t act systematically for the needs of the people really be called a democracy?

And pray that the candidates elected on those platforms don’t backtrack for the lobby of big-whatever.

So… Who’s the board of mozilla hiring the ceo, again? How did this board come to be?

Can packed silicon zapped with direct current be compared to a bunch of rocks arranged in a specific way?

Me too. And by having Linux in my primary boot, I mostly guarantee windows can’t wake itself up after I shut it down. :D

The best way to shutdown your windows computer is to install Linux.

What do you mean “like these”?

Usually businesses changing privacy policies are the ones without a revenue model that need to figure it out somehow, and aim to IPO.

10$/month way more revenue than they could be able to get with ads, and sure, let’s hope they don’t want to IPO, because that’s the root of all enshittification.

That’s why FOSS software matters. FOSS software companies can’t change policies like that, for what’s already distributed.

No, it’s about voting with you money against a whole way to do business. Long live FOSS, long live adblockers!

You mean “disappears”?

I just miss grouping channels together to have curated independent feeds. They removed it for algorithm based shit.