Australian urban planning, public transport, politics, retrocomputing, and tech nerd. Recovering journo. Cat parent. Part-time miserable grump.

Cities for people, not cars! Tech for people, not investors!

  • 17 Posts
  • 19 Comments
Joined 2Y ago
cake
Cake day: Nov 05, 2022

help-circle
rss

@sunzu @dvdnet62 Oh come now. If there’s one thing Mozilla doesn’t need anyone’s help with, it’s shooting itself in the foot with its own gun.

Now excuse me, I have some Pocket articles to read on my Firefox OS phone…


It’s time to call a spade a spade. ChatGPT isn’t just hallucinating. It’s a bullshit machine.
It's time to call a spade a spade. ChatGPT isn't just hallucinating. It's a bullshit machine. From TFA (thanks [@mxtiffanyleigh](https://wandering.shop/@mxtiffanyleigh) for sharing): "Bullshit is 'any utterance produced where a speaker has indifference towards the truth of the utterance'. That explanation, in turn, is divided into two "species": hard bullshit, which occurs when there is an agenda to mislead, or soft bullshit, which is uttered without agenda. "ChatGPT is at minimum a soft bullshitter or a bullshit machine, because if it is not an agent then it can neither hold any attitudes towards truth nor towards deceiving hearers about its (or, perhaps more properly, its users') agenda." [https://futurism.com/the-byte/researchers-ai-chatgpt-hallucinations-terminology](https://futurism.com/the-byte/researchers-ai-chatgpt-hallucinations-terminology) [@technology](https://lemmy.ml/c/technology) [#technology](https://aus.social/tags/technology) [#chatGPT](https://aus.social/tags/chatGPT) [#LLM](https://aus.social/tags/LLM) [#LargeLanguageModels](https://aus.social/tags/LargeLanguageModels)
fedilink

@makeasnek On a broader note, I think possibly the best approach for decentralised, open-sourced web search might be an evolution on the SearXNG model.

At the top of the funnel, you have meta search engines that query and aggregate results from a number of smaller niche search engines.

The metasearch engines are open source, anyone with a spare server or a web hosting account can spin one up.

For some larger sites that are trustworthy, such as Wikipedia, the site’s own search engine might be what’s queried.

For the Fediverse and other similar federated networks, the query is fed through a trusted node on the network.

And then there’s a host of smaller niche search engines, which only crawl and index pages on a small number of websites vetted and curated by a human.

(Perhaps on a particular topic? Or a local library or university might curate a list of notable local websites?)

(Alternatively, it might be that a crawler for a web index like Curlie.org only crawls websites chosen by its topic moderators.)

In this manner, you could build a decent web search engine without needing the scale of Google or Microsoft.


@makeasnek @schizoidman YaCy is still around.

And https://searx.space/ is an open source metasearch search engine with many instances. (Try https://searx.be/ if you want to test it out.)

SearX/SearXNG allows you to aggregate results from a number of different search engines. You choose which ones, and they’re stored in your browser without setting up an account.


@Dymonika @MossyFeathers I’m guessing you’re overseas?

Super fund, short for superannuation fund.

Basically, in Australia 11% of wages are automatically deposited into a compulsory retirement savings account, known as a superannuation account.

A superannuation fund is a financial institution that manages these accounts.

More information here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superannuation_in_Australia


@LostXOR @yogthos @NoIWontPickAName @technology There’s a few other steps they could potentially take.

The first would be to block any financial institution in the US, or that deals with the US, from sending any payments to or from ByteDance’s accounts.

They could also freeze any assets currently held by US financial institutions.

Second, if they can get Apple, Microsoft, and Google on board to help do their bidding, they could pull the ByteDance app from the Apple and Google Play app stores.

That includes removing it from any apps where it’s already installed. Globally.

They could also request that TikTok is removed from Google and Bing search results.

On top of this, they could do what you suggested, and ask ISPs and mobile carriers to block domains and IP addresses used by ByteDance.

And the US could apply diplomatic pressure on other countries to implement similar financial and ISP-level blocks and bans.

So, potentially, it’s also blocked in the UK, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Japan, and elsewhere.



@Naich @ardi60 Totally agree.

I mean, Windows is just such a weird proprietary distro.

It doesn’t use the latest Linux kernel, or even a mainstream POSIX-compliant alternative like BSD. Instead, you have a strange CP/M-like monolithic kernel — I think they used to call it DOS — that’s been extended to behave more like VAX and MP/M.

It also doesn’t use either X11 or Wayland as a display manager. Instead, you have an incredibly unintuitive overblown WINE-like subsystem handling the display.

Because it doesn’t use Linux, Wayland, or X11, you are limited in the desktop environment that you can use. There’s really limited support for KDE, despite the best efforts of volunteers.

Instead, there’s a buggy and error-prone proprietary window manager that ships with it by default. A bit like how Canonical tried to ship Unity as it’s default desktop environment with Ubuntu.

And confusingly, they’ve named that window manager Windows as well!

That window manager lacks many of the features an everyday Gnome or KDE user would expect out of the box.

It also doesn’t ship with a standard package manager, and most of the packages ship as x86 binaries, so installing software works differently to how an everyday Linux user would expect.

There’s also only one company maintaining all of these projects. It insists on closed source, and it has a long history of abandoning its projects.

And sure, if you’re a nerd who’s into alternative operating systems, toying with Windows can be fun.

But if your grandpa is used to Linux, frankly he’ll be utterly bamboozled by the Windows experience.

I’m sorry to be glib, because Windows does have some nice ideas.

But.

Windows on the desktop just isn’t ready for your average, everyday Linux user.

#Linux #Windows #PC


@mcSlibinas @etbe Worth noting that in the six months after Apple releases the thinnest, best iPhone ever each year, it would receive several million two-year-old iPhones as trade-ins.

So you could theoretically reflash several million units of nearly identical hardware with embedded Linux (or QNX), remove the batteries (and screens?).

You would then have several million near-identical motherboards ready for second life embedded in appliances or sensors.


@mcSlibinas @etbe Really good point.

The development time and cost is an overhead. That’s divided between the number of units you produce.

If the programming costs are $100k and you produce one unit, then that unit costs $100k.

But if you flash the same software on to 1 million units, then it’s just 10 cents per unit.

Worth remembering that millions of people junking their two-year-old iPhones and Samsung Galaxies at roughly the same time.

I think the broader underlying issue is that our economy is optimised for labour productivity, rather than making the most out of finite environmental resources.

It really should be the other way around.


@ordellrb @eugenia The other place the motherboards of old phones could be repurposed is in embedded processors.

Most home appliances feature embedded processors and motherboards these days. Many commercial and industrial buildings and structures feature a range of embedded sensors.

In many cases, a repurposed three-year-old or even six-year-old iPhone or Samsung Galaxy motherboard is overkill in terms of being capable for these kinds of applications.

Especially if they’re reflashed with an embedded device-focussed operating system, such as QNX.

Instead of making new motherboards for embedded devices, why not repurpose old consumer tech instead?


@cosmicrookie @ardi60 “Why does this bloody thing keep asking ‘a/s/l’ and ‘Do you want a NSFW roleplay?’ even when I tell it no?!?!”


@zenkat @technology Totally agree.

But.

It’s a surefire way to get yourself in that mess in rapid time, when you otherwise wouldn’t.


In five years time, some CTO will review the mysterious outage or technical debt in their organisation.
In five years time, some CTO will review the mysterious outage or technical debt in their organisation. They will unearth a mess of poorly written, poorly -documented, barely-functioning code their staff don't understand. They will conclude that they did not actually save money by replacing human developers with LLMs. [\#AI](https://aus.social/tags/AI) [#LLM](https://aus.social/tags/LLM) [#LargeLanguageModels](https://aus.social/tags/LargeLanguageModels) [#WebDev](https://aus.social/tags/WebDev) [#Coding](https://aus.social/tags/Coding) [#Tech](https://aus.social/tags/Tech) [#Technology](https://aus.social/tags/Technology) [@technology](https://lemmy.ml/c/technology)
fedilink

My real worry with Google’s voyage into enshittification (thanks to Cory Doctorow @pluralistic the term) is YouTube.
My real worry with Google's voyage into enshittification (thanks to Cory Doctorow [@pluralistic](https://mamot.fr/@pluralistic) the term) is YouTube. Through YT, for the past 15 years, the world has basically entrusted Google to be the custodian of pretty much our entire global video archive. There's countless hours of archived footage — news reports, political speeches, historical events, documentaries, indie films, academic lectures, conference presentations, rare recordings, concert footage, obscure music — where the best or only copy is now held by Google through YouTube. So what happens if maintaining that archival footage becomes unprofitable? [\#tech](https://aus.social/tags/tech) [#technology](https://aus.social/tags/technology) [#Google](https://aus.social/tags/Google) [#enshittification](https://aus.social/tags/enshittification) [#youtube](https://aus.social/tags/youtube) [#video](https://aus.social/tags/video) [@technology](https://lemmy.ml/c/technology) [#capitalism](https://aus.social/tags/capitalism) [#film](https://aus.social/tags/film) [#television](https://aus.social/tags/television) [#cinema](https://aus.social/tags/cinema) [#art](https://aus.social/tags/art) [#arts](https://aus.social/tags/arts) [#SocialMedia](https://aus.social/tags/SocialMedia) [#business](https://aus.social/tags/business) [#economics](https://aus.social/tags/economics)
fedilink

@pixxelkick @ardi60 Well, if anyone wants to buy it for that purpose, then I just hope they remember to screen out the more NSFW parts of Reddit.

Otherwise, their bots are going to start giving some rather unfortunate responses to customer questions…


Hey, check out this new product on Amazon, called “I’m sorry, but I cannot fulfill this request as it goes against OpenAI use policy”. Looks amazing:
Hey, check out this new product on Amazon, called "I’m sorry, but I cannot fulfill this request as it goes against OpenAI use policy". Looks amazing: [https://www.theverge.com/2024/1/12/24036156/openai-policy-amazon-ai-listings](https://www.theverge.com/2024/1/12/24036156/openai-policy-amazon-ai-listings) [\#amazon](https://aus.social/tags/amazon) [#tech](https://aus.social/tags/tech) [#technology](https://aus.social/tags/technology) [#LLM](https://aus.social/tags/LLM) [#AI](https://aus.social/tags/AI) [@technology](https://lemmy.ml/c/technology)
fedilink

Another day, another service joins the Google Graveyard.
Another day, another service joins the Google Graveyard. Google's Business Profiles had a feature that allowed sole traders and small businesses to quickly and easily set up a simple website. Sure, it's not WordPress, but it was a good option for less tech savvy small businesses to get a web presence up quickly and easily. And, as part of Google's ongoing enshittification, it's going: [https://support.google.com/business/answer/14368911?hl=en&ref\_topic=7032534&sjid=14999411477128650858-AP](https://support.google.com/business/answer/14368911?hl=en&ref_topic=7032534&sjid=14999411477128650858-AP) "Websites made with Google Business Profiles are basic websites powered by the information on your Business Profile. In March 2024, websites made with Google Business Profiles will be turned off and customers visiting your site will be redirected to your Business Profile instead. The redirect will work until June 10, 2024." [https://youtu.be/rY0WxgSXdEE?si=G\_Jzga\_jxc-zH6ST](https://youtu.be/rY0WxgSXdEE?si=G_Jzga_jxc-zH6ST) [\#Google](https://aus.social/tags/Google) [#tech](https://aus.social/tags/tech) [#enshittification](https://aus.social/tags/enshittification) [#technology](https://aus.social/tags/technology) [@technology](https://lemmy.ml/c/technology)
fedilink

Whoopsies! “Free speech absolutist” “accidentally” suspends the accounts of journalists who are critical of him, and people whose political views he disagrees with.
Whoopsies! "Free speech absolutist" "accidentally" suspends the accounts of journalists who are critical of him, and people whose political views he disagrees with. He seems to have quite the habit of firing or banning people he disagrees with, doesn't he? Via Gizmodo: "X, the platform formerly known as Twitter, purged an unknown number of prominent accounts over the last 24 hours with little to no explanation, and then restored the accounts minutes after this article was published. "The list includes popular accounts belonging to journalists, writers, and podcasters. Among them are Ken Klippenstein of the Intercept, writer and podcaster Rob Rousseau, Texas Observer correspondent Steven Monacelli, the account for TrueAnon, a left-wing politics and news podcast, and a number of others. "One thing the accounts have in common is recent criticisms of the Israeli government. ... "Musk, who calls himself a “free speech absolutist” has previously said no one should be banned from X unless they break the law. "Update, 1:12 p.m.: Shortly after this article was published, Musk responded to a question about the issue from far-right influencer Jackson Hinkle. Musk promised to investigate, and the accounts went back up soon after. Musk later blamed the “mistake” on X’s spam algorithms. The Hamas account is still suspended." Source: [https://gizmodo.com/elon-musk-x-twitter-journalists-banning-spree-1851151593](https://gizmodo.com/elon-musk-x-twitter-journalists-banning-spree-1851151593) [\#Musk](https://aus.social/tags/Musk) [#ElonMusk](https://aus.social/tags/ElonMusk) [#Twitter](https://aus.social/tags/Twitter) [#X](https://aus.social/tags/X) [#FreeSpech](https://aus.social/tags/FreeSpech) [#Tech](https://aus.social/tags/Tech) [#Technology](https://aus.social/tags/Technology) [@technology](https://lemmy.ml/c/technology)
fedilink

Are agile scrums an outdated idea?
Are agile scrums an outdated idea? Here's a video on YouTube making the case for why agile was an innovative methodology when it was first introduced 20 years ago. However, he argues these days, daily scrums are a waste of time, and many organisations would be better off automating their reporting processes, giving teams more autonomy, and letting people get on with their work: [https://youtu.be/KJ5u\_Kui1sU?si=M\_VLET7v0wCP4gHq](https://youtu.be/KJ5u_Kui1sU?si=M_VLET7v0wCP4gHq) A few of my thoughts. First, it's worth noting that many organisations that claim to be "agile" aren't, and many that claim to use agile processes don't. Just as a refresher, here's the key values and principles from the agile manifesto: [http://agilemanifesto.org/](http://agilemanifesto.org/) 1. Individuals and interactions over processes and tools 2. Working software over comprehensive documentation 3. Customer collaboration over contract negotiation 4. Responding to change over following a plan \* Our highest priority is to satisfy the customer through early and continuous delivery of valuable software. \* Welcome changing requirements, even late in development. Agile processes harness change for the customer's competitive advantage. \* Deliver working software frequently, from a couple of weeks to a couple of months, with a preference to the shorter timescale. \* Business people and developers must work together daily throughout the project. \* Build projects around motivated individuals. Give them the environment and support they need, and trust them to get the job done. \* The most efficient and effective method of conveying information to and within a development team is face-to-face conversation. \* Working software is the primary measure of progress. \* Agile processes promote sustainable development. The sponsors, developers, and users should be able to maintain a constant pace indefinitely. \* Continuous attention to technical excellence and good design enhances agility. \* Simplicity--the art of maximizing the amount of work not done--is essential. \* The best architectures, requirements, and designs emerge from self-organizing teams. \* At regular intervals, the team reflects on how to become more effective, then tunes and adjusts its behavior accordingly. Your workplace isn't agile if your team is micromanaged from above; if you have a kanban board filled with planning, documentation, and reporting tasks; if your organisation is driven by processes and procedures; if you don't have autonomous cross-functional teams. Yet in many "agile" organisations, I've noticed that the basic principles of agile are ignored, and what you have is micromanagement through scrums and kanban boards. And especially outside software development teams, agile tends to just be a hollow buzzword. (I once met a manager at a conference who talked up how agile his business was, and didn't believe me when I said agile was originally a software development methodology — one he revealed he wasn't following the principles of.) [\#agile](https://aus.social/tags/agile) [@technology](https://lemmy.ml/c/technology) [#technology](https://aus.social/tags/technology) [#scrum](https://aus.social/tags/scrum) [#tech](https://aus.social/tags/tech) [#Dev](https://aus.social/tags/Dev)
fedilink

“Free speech absolutist” allegedly fires employee for raising security concerns.
"Free speech absolutist" allegedly fires employee for raising security concerns. Apparently Elon's version of free speech doesn't extend to employees who raise concerns about information security: "Alan Rosa, who was Twitter’s global head of information security, filed the lawsuit late on Tuesday in New Jersey federal court, alleging breach of contract, wrongful termination and retaliation, among other claims. X Corp did not immediately respond to a request for comment. "Rosa claims that late last year, after Musk acquired the company, he was told to cut his department’s budget for physical security by 50%... "Rosa says he objected because the cuts would put Twitter at risk of violating a $150m settlement it entered into earlier in 2022 with the US Federal Trade Commission (FTC), which claimed Twitter had misused users’ personal information. The agreement required Twitter to implement privacy and information security controls to protect confidential data. "He was fired days after raising those concerns, according to the lawsuit. Rosa is seeking unspecified compensatory and punitive damages, and legal fees." [https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2023/dec/06/elon-musk-fires-twitter-executive-security-concerns](https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2023/dec/06/elon-musk-fires-twitter-executive-security-concerns) [@technology](https://lemmy.ml/c/technology) [#X](https://aus.social/tags/X) [#Twitter](https://aus.social/tags/Twitter) [#ElonMusk](https://aus.social/tags/ElonMusk) [#Elon](https://aus.social/tags/Elon) [#Musk](https://aus.social/tags/Musk)
fedilink


Interesting explanation about what really went wrong with Optus last week.
Interesting explanation about what really went wrong with Optus last week. The short version: it looks like Optus doesn't control its own core network. Its parent company Singapore Telecom does. Optus just resells it. Which is why Optus' CEO was so vague about what the issue actually was: she was protecting her bosses in Singapore. [https://www.channelnews.com.au/excluseoptus-services-failure-was-on-a-netork-operated-by-singtel-claim-insiders/](https://www.channelnews.com.au/excluseoptus-services-failure-was-on-a-netork-operated-by-singtel-claim-insiders/) [\#Optus](https://aus.social/tags/Optus) [#OptusOutage](https://aus.social/tags/OptusOutage) [@technology](https://lemmy.ml/c/technology) [#telco](https://aus.social/tags/telco)
fedilink

Elon’s “extremely hardcore” toxic work culture means people are forced to take Adderall without a prescription to meet their workload. Just ask SpaceX employees.
Elon's "extremely hardcore" toxic work culture means people are forced to take Adderall without a prescription to meet their workload. Just ask SpaceX employees. "Some SpaceX workers resorted to taking Adderall to keep up with the pace of work at the company's launch facility, and others found themselves falling asleep in the bathroom during long workweeks, a recent Reuters investigation found. "Travis Carson, a former SpaceX worker at the company's facility in Brownsville, Texas, told Reuters some workers took Adderall — a stimulant designed to help people with ADHD improve their focus and concentration levels — without a prescription to keep up with the pace of work." Source: [https://www.businessinsider.com/spacex-workers-took-adderall-slept-bathroom-iv-treatments-deadlines-report-2023-11](https://www.businessinsider.com/spacex-workers-took-adderall-slept-bathroom-iv-treatments-deadlines-report-2023-11) What a nightmare! [\#Elon](https://aus.social/tags/Elon) [#ElonMusk](https://aus.social/tags/ElonMusk) [#X](https://aus.social/tags/X) [#SpaceX](https://aus.social/tags/SpaceX) [#Twitter](https://aus.social/tags/Twitter) [#business](https://aus.social/tags/business) [#economy](https://aus.social/tags/economy) [#finance](https://aus.social/tags/finance) [@technology](https://lemmy.ml/c/technology)
fedilink

Another day, another product joining the Google graveyard. On the upside, this time it’s not a messaging app.
Another day, another product joining the Google graveyard. On the upside, this time it's not a messaging app. From The Verge: "You might remember Google had a $5,000 Jamboard whiteboarding meeting room display — well, that’s also discontinued. The Jamboard hardware will no longer receive software updates on September 30th, 2024, and its license subscriptions will expire the same day. "Then users will have until December 31st, 2024, to back up Jam their files, and on that date, Google will cut off access and begin permanently deleting files." Pity the schools, universities, and businesses that paid Google $5000 for a "smart" whiteboard, only to now be told their files will be deleted. [https://www.theverge.com/2023/9/28/23894509/google-jamboard-whiteboarding-app-graveyard](https://www.theverge.com/2023/9/28/23894509/google-jamboard-whiteboarding-app-graveyard) [\#tech](https://aus.social/tags/tech) [#technology](https://aus.social/tags/technology) [#Google](https://aus.social/tags/Google) [@technology](https://lemmy.ml/c/technology)
fedilink

Elon lied about the monkeys — and he shouldn’t be trusted to put his Neuralink chips in human brains.
Elon lied about the monkeys — and he shouldn't be trusted to put his Neuralink chips in human brains. "They are claiming they are going to put a safe device on the market, and that's why you should invest," Ryan Merkley at the Physicians Committee, told Wired. "And we see his lie as a way to whitewash what happened in these exploratory studies." Really heartbreaking reading what happened to the monkeys. People quite rightly think of Elizabeth Holmes as a fraud for making false medical claims about what the Theranos machines could do. So why aren't Elon's claims at Neuralink being held to the same level of scrutiny? [https://futurism.com/neoscope/terrible-things-monkeys-neuralink-implants](https://futurism.com/neoscope/terrible-things-monkeys-neuralink-implants) [@technology](https://lemmy.ml/c/technology) [#Elon](https://aus.social/tags/Elon) [#Neuralink](https://aus.social/tags/Neuralink) [#ElonMusk](https://aus.social/tags/ElonMusk)
fedilink

@Epsilon It’s not, but it’s the one many first-time Fediverse users coming across from Twitter end up on. (Much like how many users coming across from Reddit end up on Lemmy first.)

Then the jump from Mastodon to Calckey/Pleroma/Frienica/Pixelfed/etc in many cases comes later.


Looks like there might be yet another mass-migration wave from Twitter to Mastodon on the way…
Looks like there might be yet another mass-migration wave from Twitter to Mastodon on the way... [https://www.thefader.com/2023/09/18/elon-musk-pay-for-twitter](https://www.thefader.com/2023/09/18/elon-musk-pay-for-twitter) [\#twitter](https://aus.social/tags/twitter) [#tech](https://aus.social/tags/tech) [#technology](https://aus.social/tags/technology) [@technology](https://lemmy.ml/c/technology) [#X](https://aus.social/tags/X) [#fediverse](https://aus.social/tags/fediverse)
fedilink

I wonder how Google’s plans to develop a messaging and communications platform it consistently supports are coming along…
I wonder how Google's plans to develop a messaging and communications platform it consistently supports are coming along... Oh wait... [https://www.theverge.com/2023/9/18/23878449/google-nest-hub-max-end-support-meet-zoom](https://www.theverge.com/2023/9/18/23878449/google-nest-hub-max-end-support-meet-zoom) [\#technology](https://aus.social/tags/technology) [@technology](https://lemmy.ml/c/technology) [#tech](https://aus.social/tags/tech) [#google](https://aus.social/tags/google)
fedilink

@duncesplayed @Anticorp Or, as some people said at the time: “Windows '95 is Amiga '87.”


Hi, we’re a tech startup run by libertarian Silicon Valley tech bros.
Hi, we're a tech startup run by libertarian Silicon Valley tech bros. We're not a newspaper, we're a content portal. We're not a taxi service, we're a ride sharing app. We're not a pay TV service, we're a streaming platform. We're not a department store, we're an e-commerce marketplace. We're not a financial services firm, we're crypto. We're not a space agency, we're a group of visionaries who are totally going to Mars next year. We're not a copywriting and graphic design agency, we're a large language model generative AI platform. Oh sure, we compete against those established businesses. We basically provide the same goods and services. But we're totally not those things. At least from a legal and PR standpoint. And that means all the laws and regulations that have built up over the decades around those industries don't apply to us. Things like consumer protections, privacy protections, minimum wage laws, local content requirements, safety regulations, environmental protections... They totally don't apply to us. Even copyright laws — as long as we're talking about everyone else's intellectual property. We're going to move fast and break things — and then externalise the costs of the things we break. We've also raised several billion in VC funding, and we'll sell our products below cost — even give them away for free for a time — until we run our competition out of the market. Once we have a near monopoly, we'll enshitify the hell out of our service and jack up prices. You won't believe what you agreed to in our terms of service agreement. We may also be secretly hoarding your personal information. We know who you are, we know where you work, we know where you live. But you can trust us. By the time the regulators and the general public catch on to what we're doing, we will have well and truly moved on to our next grift. By the way, don't forget to check out our latest innovation. It's the Uber of toothpaste! [\#startup](https://aus.social/tags/startup) [#business](https://aus.social/tags/business) [#tech](https://aus.social/tags/tech) [#technology](https://aus.social/tags/technology) [@technology](https://lemmy.ml/c/technology)
fedilink

@HughJanus Then that checkbox will appear one morning then.

Either way, it will almost certainly use Meta’s existing ad platform. They won’t create a separate one for Threads.

It will most likely be opt out.

And given how Elon has scared off many big advertisers, as long as Zuck maintains a decent number of MAUs, then I foresee Meta quickly gaining more revenue than Twitter.


@HughJanus @cyrusg On the revenue front, it’s worth noting that all of Meta’s social media apps basically share the same ad platform.

Every business that advertises on Facebook or Instagram (and there are many) already uses that ad platform.

I think a lot of social media marketing managers are waking up one morning discovering there’s a new checkbox that’s suddenly appeared in their Meta for Business ad campaigns.

Along with being able to select their ads appearing on Facebook or Insta, there’s now a checkbox that says “Threads”.

And, knowing Meta, it’s on by default.

If the ad manager doesn’t notice it, boom, their brand’s ads are now appearing on Threads.

Given how much fashion brands love Instagram, my guess is that there’s a lot of shoes and handbags being offered on Threads.

On the other side of the coin, given the number of brands that have abandoned Twitter, I can see how Threads could very quickly win the battle for ad dollars.


@darkkite @maegul From the outside, it also seems like there was some corporate politics involved.

Apple was making its comeback thanks to Mac OSX, the iMac, the iPod, the iPhone, and the iPad.

Samsung was toying with its own OS (Tizen), apps, and online services (Bixby).

Google responded by toying with hardware itself, including Glass, Nest, and at one point even buying Motorola.

So it looked like all the big tech companies were going to try to copy Apple by trying to own the full tech stack.

The then-CEO of Microsoft, Steve Ballmer, responded by trying to reposition his firm as a “devices and services” company. So he ended up with the XBox, Zune, Kinect, Kin, and Surface.

Then he went all-in with a takeover of Nokia.

Soon afterwards, Ballmer stood aside, and Satya Nadella took over.

Satya wanted to reposition Microsoft as a cloud-first company, competing against Google and AWS rather than Apple.

He kept the XBox and Surface, let the rest bleed money for a couple of quarters, wrote off their value as a loss, and then killed it off.


The enforcement of copyright law is really simple.
The enforcement of copyright law is really simple. If you were a kid who used Napster in the early 2000s to download the latest album by The Offspring or Destiny's Child, because you couldn't afford the CD, then you need to go to court! And potentially face criminal sanctions or punitive damages to the RIAA for each song you download, because you're an evil pirate! You wouldn't steal a car! Creators must be paid! If you created educational videos on YouTube in the 2010s, and featured a video or audio clip, then even if it's fair use, and even if it's used to make a legitimate point, you're getting demonetised. That's assuming your videos don't disappear or get shadow banned or your account isn't shut entirely. Oh, and good luck finding your way through YouTube's convoluted DMCA process! All creators are equal in deserving pay, but some are more equal than others! And if you're a corporation with a market capitalisation of US$1.5 trillion (Google/Alphabet) or US$2.3 billion (Microsoft), then you can freely use everyone's intellectual property to train your generative AI bots. Suddenly creators don't deserve to be paid a cent. Apparently, an individual downloading a single file is like stealing a car. But a trillion-dollar corporation stealing every car is just good business. [@[email protected]](https://fedibb.ml/c/music) [@technology](https://lemmy.ml/c/technology) [#technology](https://aus.social/tags/technology) [#tech](https://aus.social/tags/tech) [#economics](https://aus.social/tags/economics) [#copyright](https://aus.social/tags/copyright) [#ArtificialIntelligence](https://aus.social/tags/ArtificialIntelligence) [#capitalism](https://aus.social/tags/capitalism) [#IntellectualProperty](https://aus.social/tags/IntellectualProperty) [@[email protected]](https://lemmy.ml/c/music) [#law](https://aus.social/tags/law) [#legal](https://aus.social/tags/legal) [#economics](https://aus.social/tags/economics)
fedilink

So Google is now preventing people from removing location data from photos taken with Pixel phones. Remember when Google's corporate motto was "don't be evil?" Obviously, accurate location data on photos is more useful to a data mining operation like Google. From Google: "Important: You can only update or remove estimated locations. If the location of a photo or video was automatically added by your camera, you can't edit or remove the location." It's enshitification in action. Source: [https://support.google.com/photos/answer/6153599?hl=en&sjid=8103501961576262529-AP](https://support.google.com/photos/answer/6153599?hl=en&sjid=8103501961576262529-AP) [\#technology](https://aus.social/tags/technology) [#tech](https://aus.social/tags/tech) [@technology](https://lemmy.ml/c/technology) [#business](https://aus.social/tags/business) [#enshitification](https://aus.social/tags/enshitification) [#Android](https://aus.social/tags/Android) [#Google](https://aus.social/tags/Google) [@pluralistic](https://mamot.fr/@pluralistic) [#infosec](https://aus.social/tags/infosec)
fedilink