He probably found himself on the bottom 5% performers after losing the company billions if dollaroos with the dumb VR investing. He just didn’t want to be let go.
The idea, cruel as it may be, is that you keep hiring more people while chopping off the bottom, keeping the headcount at your desirable level.
Unregretted attrition is however one of the most potent poisons you can introduce into your company culture. Perhaps this is why Zuck opted against it this year - signs of cultural decay may have already set in.
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]
This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.
Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.
Rules:
1: All Lemmy rules apply
2: Do not post low effort posts
3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff
4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.
5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)
6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist
7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed
“But you see, chopping the bottom 10% isn’t the same as chopping the bottom 5%.”
“But you see, chopping the bottom 1% every month of the year isn’t the same as chopping the bottom 5% in a single action”
“But you see, chainsawing the bottom 5% isn’t the same as chopping the bottom 5%”
The ol’ rank and yank.
They could do that every year till its only Mark left
He probably found himself on the bottom 5% performers after losing the company billions if dollaroos with the dumb VR investing. He just didn’t want to be let go.
He just wants Nintendo to bring MIIs back
The idea, cruel as it may be, is that you keep hiring more people while chopping off the bottom, keeping the headcount at your desirable level.
Unregretted attrition is however one of the most potent poisons you can introduce into your company culture. Perhaps this is why Zuck opted against it this year - signs of cultural decay may have already set in.
This shit is awful.
You end up with managers hiring bad candidates to save the rest of their team.
Just to add, it also could remove ppl who support the team because their numbers are low. Seen it happen so many times…
People need money and they are willing to sell their soul, bend over backwards, lick them boots to climb that corporate ladder.
The hierarchy has been created for a reason and nobody can fuck with Mark. Know your place pleb!
Now I see you’re trying to use your shtoyle over mine
🤣😉