These could be good if they go into a good system and aren’t bootlocked. Otherwise I’d argue that’s not even a PC.
The confusing branding of having two chip variants with vastly different specs but identical names is really bad. Like Russian roulette bad, except you shoot yourself in the foot instead of the head (for as long as you own the product).
Qualcomm has historically been one of the most closed chip vendors. Unless they publish full specs, datasheets and open drivers, that’ll be a hard ‘no’ for me.
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]
No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
No Let’s Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates.
(Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources.
If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)
Qualcomm support on Linux has been too mediocre and late to take it seriously so far over x86 products
Yeah I don’t get how an arm chip could be perfect solution for PC gaming.
Competition to Intel+AMD+Nvidia.
These could be good if they go into a good system and aren’t bootlocked. Otherwise I’d argue that’s not even a PC.
The confusing branding of having two chip variants with vastly different specs but identical names is really bad. Like Russian roulette bad, except you shoot yourself in the foot instead of the head (for as long as you own the product).
Qualcomm has historically been one of the most closed chip vendors. Unless they publish full specs, datasheets and open drivers, that’ll be a hard ‘no’ for me.