From what simple I understand, undoing combustion is as inconvenient as combusting it is. The more energy a combustion outputs, the more difficult it is to undo it. But if they’ve found a catalyst to pull it off then I’m hopeful that it could work and maybe bring progress
I’m guessing a big part of it is also having energy independence, and if the input energy comes from renewables or nuclear then it might actually end up being carbon neutral.
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]
This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.
Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.
Rules:
1: All Lemmy rules apply
2: Do not post low effort posts
3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff
4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.
5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)
6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist
7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed
From what simple I understand, undoing combustion is as inconvenient as combusting it is. The more energy a combustion outputs, the more difficult it is to undo it. But if they’ve found a catalyst to pull it off then I’m hopeful that it could work and maybe bring progress
I’m guessing a big part of it is also having energy independence, and if the input energy comes from renewables or nuclear then it might actually end up being carbon neutral.