DLSS 5 is on track for a Fall 2026 debut and replaces a game’s original textures with AI-inflused versions to make them hyperreal. Or, out of one uncanny valley and into another!
Far from the first circlejerk slop, tho. I’m sure like in all circlejerks, the people going all into their presumptions will surely admit they were wrong when proven so, surely.
If NVIDIA was lying and this was all marketing, they would have definitely done more to hide the clearly obvious flaws of DLSS 5. It’s a shame that we can’t have a decent discussion about them because the circlejerk slop is just slopping the argument down into an hallucination.
I’ve actually just been corrected, this was referred to employ some form of generative AI by Jensen. It’s also significantly different enough to what I generally thought of as AI slop and my issues with it that it could also be said that I am a supporter of generative AI now.
Your usage of “slop” is really confusing.
But i understsnd what you’re saying (i think).
Hopefully you find someone to discuss with!
Edit: lmao nvm, I’ve happened across your other comments in one of the other posts and yoi clearly aren’t interested in discussion and get offended when people disagree with you.
Also, you come across as a slop-supporter.
Is that so? Thank you for your constructive criticism. No I was not interested in a discussion, but I was under the impression that neither were you. My support for AI slop is conditional and rather minimal, but I do not believe the concept applies here. Thank you for your laughter, it brings joy into the thread.
I’ve actually just been corrected, this was referred to employ some form of generative AI by Jensen. It’s also significantly different enough to what I generally thought of as AI slop and my issues with it that your suspicion has turned out to be right, I do support some form of generative AI now.
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]
No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
No Let’s Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates.
(Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources.
If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)
Far from the first circlejerk slop, tho. I’m sure like in all circlejerks, the people going all into their presumptions will surely admit they were wrong when proven so, surely.
If NVIDIA was lying and this was all marketing, they would have definitely done more to hide the clearly obvious flaws of DLSS 5. It’s a shame that we can’t have a decent discussion about them because the circlejerk slop is just slopping the argument down into an hallucination.
I’ve actually just been corrected, this was referred to employ some form of generative AI by Jensen. It’s also significantly different enough to what I generally thought of as AI slop and my issues with it that it could also be said that I am a supporter of generative AI now.
Your usage of “slop” is really confusing.
But i understsnd what you’re saying (i think).
Hopefully you find someone to discuss with!Edit: lmao nvm, I’ve happened across your other comments in one of the other posts and yoi clearly aren’t interested in discussion and get offended when people disagree with you.
Also, you come across as a slop-supporter.
Is that so? Thank you for your constructive criticism. No I was not interested in a discussion, but I was under the impression that neither were you. My support for AI slop is conditional and rather minimal,
but I do not believe the concept applies here.Thank you for your laughter, it brings joy into the thread.I’ve actually just been corrected, this was referred to employ some form of generative AI by Jensen. It’s also significantly different enough to what I generally thought of as AI slop and my issues with it that your suspicion has turned out to be right, I do support some form of generative AI now.