Only because he sold it as Bitcoin. As long as there is a direct trail to money lost for a company, otherwise I doubt the court would have made such a consideration. This was the second court case regarding it, so the lawyers and the court are definitely making plenty of their salary off of it.
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]
No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
No Let’s Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates.
(Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources.
If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)
Only because he sold it as Bitcoin. As long as there is a direct trail to money lost for a company, otherwise I doubt the court would have made such a consideration. This was the second court case regarding it, so the lawyers and the court are definitely making plenty of their salary off of it.