GTX 750 Ti was an absolute champ even for playing games at 1440p, and I would argue the GTX 1060/1050 were worth spiritual successors.
20 years ago you’re looking at an MX440, over AGP if you were lucky.
In think they had many market segments covered, even with their Shield products.
It’s clear that where they are going, tech enthusiasts/consumers won’t sustain them, though. They will have to overextend themselves in Corpo bullshit, and either behind just another nightmare conglomerate, or die trying.
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]
No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
No Let’s Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates.
(Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources.
If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)
Nvidia has almost never given a shit about the low end market. They haven’t made a good low end GPU in like 20 years.
GTX 750 Ti was an absolute champ even for playing games at 1440p, and I would argue the GTX 1060/1050 were worth spiritual successors.
20 years ago you’re looking at an MX440, over AGP if you were lucky.
In think they had many market segments covered, even with their Shield products.
It’s clear that where they are going, tech enthusiasts/consumers won’t sustain them, though. They will have to overextend themselves in Corpo bullshit, and either behind just another nightmare conglomerate, or die trying.