I’m about to play Back 4 Blood, the “spiritual successor” to Left 4 Dead.
This game has mixed reviews. And based on comments, it looks like the online co-op and PvP is dead.
Now whenever I see blowback on games like this, I wonder if it’s because Back 4 Blood is simply not exactly like Left 4 Dead even though it was made by the same developers. It’s what I like to call the Yooka-Laylee Phenomenon.
Or is this more like the Mighty No. 9 Phenomenon where, it’s not so much the spiritual successor isn’t exactly like the original, but nowhere near as good as the original?
Hard to say without playing.
I do notice that, for whatever reason, Steam reviewers tend to privilege indie releases over AAA titles. So that might be something to do with it too.
I don’t know. This is all conjecture from someone who’s yet to play it yet. However, last Steam sale, I bought this for C$3.99 – which was 95% off. So how bad can it really be?
I’ve played it. It is fine. Graphically updated to L4D, some weird upgrade system, kinda forgettable story, less snappy movement and controls to L4D, but enjoyable in a party.
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]
No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
No Let’s Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates.
(Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources.
If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)
I’ve played it. It is fine. Graphically updated to L4D, some weird upgrade system, kinda forgettable story, less snappy movement and controls to L4D, but enjoyable in a party.