In effect, Air Canada suggests the chatbot is a separate legal entity that is responsible for its own actions.
The airline also argued that the chatbot’s response to Moffatt’s inquiry included a link to a section of its website that outlined the company’s policy and said that requests for a discounted fare are not allowed after someone has travelled.
So what Air Canada is saying is “If the bot says you’re supposed to get this deal, we aren’t liable, but if the same bot also says you aren’t supposed to get this deal contradicting itself in the same breath, then that should be upheld in court to benefit us”.
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]
This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.
Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.
Rules:
1: All Lemmy rules apply
2: Do not post low effort posts
3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff
4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.
5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)
6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist
7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed
So what Air Canada is saying is “If the bot says you’re supposed to get this deal, we aren’t liable, but if the same bot also says you aren’t supposed to get this deal contradicting itself in the same breath, then that should be upheld in court to benefit us”.
Sorry lol, you don’t get to have it both ways.
I have no words to describe what a dumb take that is
taps on the sign