Looks like from the article they still are losing 125 million dollars net a year. They’re moving towards profitability though, so I’d think these layoffs wouldn’t be necessary? I guess that depends how urgently their investors are requiring their money back.
do investors base their requirements for money on logical criteria or is just ‘more this year than last year’? It seems to me that publicly traded companies led by investors act like children failing the marshmellow test
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]
Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)
Posts.
News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
No humor/memes etc…
No affiliate links
No advertising.
No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
No self promotion.
No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
No politics.
Comments.
No personal attacks.
Obey instance rules.
No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc…)
Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.
My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.
Looks like from the article they still are losing 125 million dollars net a year. They’re moving towards profitability though, so I’d think these layoffs wouldn’t be necessary? I guess that depends how urgently their investors are requiring their money back.
do investors base their requirements for money on logical criteria or is just ‘more this year than last year’? It seems to me that publicly traded companies led by investors act like children failing the marshmellow test
“I don’t know anything about this but I can conclude they are all dumb”