I hate how the article is written in a way that those are bad things.
No, you corporate swines, those are good things. Just because your ass has been blinded by money, growth, money and money, and now the EU does something against your greed and bad practices you throw a antrum.
That’s what governments are for. (BTW: thx Finland for you are the reason the chat-control-proposal got destroyed)
It’s not so much written as a bad thing, but written as something that can bite EA-esque developers (the target audience) on the ass if they’re not careful.
Lots of GDPR stuff is written about in the same way too. The focus is on the fines, not the net societal benefit of these laws because this is aimed at the operational folk in charge of making sure products comply
It’s a warning and guideline piece rolled into one.
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]
Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)
Posts.
News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
No humor/memes etc…
No affiliate links
No advertising.
No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
No self promotion.
No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
No politics.
Comments.
No personal attacks.
Obey instance rules.
No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc…)
Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.
My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.
I hate how the article is written in a way that those are bad things.
No, you corporate swines, those are good things. Just because your ass has been blinded by money, growth, money and money, and now the EU does something against your greed and bad practices you throw a antrum.
That’s what governments are for. (BTW: thx Finland for you are the reason the chat-control-proposal got destroyed)
It’s not so much written as a bad thing, but written as something that can bite EA-esque developers (the target audience) on the ass if they’re not careful.
Lots of GDPR stuff is written about in the same way too. The focus is on the fines, not the net societal benefit of these laws because this is aimed at the operational folk in charge of making sure products comply
It’s a warning and guideline piece rolled into one.
Oh, CC got killed? My day just got better then.