It really depends on how long you want to keep the monitor and how it’s used. (Don’t click the link before enabling ublock, please!)

There’s also LCD degradation and in some cases it can be far more bothersome than burn-in.

LCD has uniformity issues. Every technology has downsides. Image permanece is not an issue in modern OLED screens, especially not in those sold at the price points pulse tech will be available at.

This is just another episode of capital shitting on the cobsumer and coming up with some marketing BS to pass on as innovation. Like Gsync, the VESA consortium had been working on variable display for years, NV releases a proprietary first try and becomes the “precedent” creator. Much like Musk being a Tesla founder…

This is completely useless for consumers at large as its only point would be to bring OLED like motion clarity to mundane LCD display tech. Since it requires added HW and the starting price is the same as far superior OLED screens, you’d have to have lobotomized to invest in this BS. Shame on DF for being sell outs and not addressing any of this. Also, 75hz floor… Oh fuck right off out of here with your advertorials DF!