In the spirit of dumbing down the plot to make sure viewers don’t turn away, they end up making totally nonsensical (if not misleading) content.

So basically an OS. The only difference is that the OS developer doesn’t control or make all the apps (features). Which I think is good for competition, but bad for tight integration.

But this is exactly what we like to avoid from Google and Apple. Perhaps, it can work in China because of strong Govt oversight (read: control), but not in U.S…

TL;DR over from Puget reddit accounts is that their overall failure rates for all chips is very low because they run it at tightly controlled base specs.

So any automatic boosting/OC doesn’t come in play here, which might be why Intel chips are failing more in the broader user space.

Why does “nothing but” and “all but” mean the same thing?

The video fails to explain what about this is “AI” as opposed to active noise cancelling with some regular old signal processing.

The article didn’t bother to link the paper. Also odd way to put it to say it “increases signature”. Like, have they found a way to throw radar reflecting goo on the F-22?

No, this is essentially about networked radars. Which would be interesting if they bothered to discuss the tech. I suppose I’ll wait for Sandboxx News to cover it.

You’re thinking with capitalism of the yesteryear.