I would imagine the difference is that all our laws assume a human being with all its flaws and limitations. The Savant with perfect memory etc etc is an edge case.
AI seems to industrialize something human practice long and hard for.
Doesn’t the AI copy and store the authors work internally and then have the AI software do its work? Then at the core are copied works that where never licensed for this.
Or, you either:
Good, secure and reliable IT is difficult to setup and maintain. SaaS has a definitive role but one has to be wary of the risks.
Would be interesting if the models where indeed trained on works that where not obtained legally.
Also most works contain a notice that it cannot be reproduced without consent, and storing its content in your database seems reproduction.
What an interesting time this will be for lawyers, not to mention licerative.
What a weird argument to make. Noone needed to suggest closing off social media in China as it is already an established form of control and surveillance for the state.
And the whataboutism regarding the draconian laws in France don’t change that.
Both can be wrong for completely different reasons. And I reject the false equivalence you are trying to make.
But we seem to have strayed far from Japanese creators switching to weibo and the possible risks that this could bring the creators. As I said before, I hope it brings them nothing but joy and prosperity.
Emmanuel Macron is facing a backlash after threatening to cut off social media networks as a means of stopping the spread of violence during periods of unrest.
Critics said considering such measures would put France alongside authoritarian countries such as China, Russia, Iran and North Korea.
So threatening to do something and getting a lot of pushback for even suggesting it, is the same as what happens in the PRC. Got it.
Nah, Border disputes with Buthan and India, but more importantly the south China sea. The island disputes with Vietnam, Phillipines, Japan.
Even suggesting the border is not the way China’s official policy states will get you in trouble in China, and that’s what my comment initially was about. Japanese artists taking art in a platform where they open themselves up for potential problems with the PRC.
I’m not from around there, but the heavy handed way the Chinese government suppresses dissenting is worrying, and not something people are used to when from a free democratic society. There seem to be a lot of intricacies to what you can and cannot say. And even though Weibo gives people access to the immense user base, there is a risk. A moment of not being careful (saying something not acceptable to China) can have huge consequences (up to and including loss of freedom).
Oh no, you got me there. You know very well what I meant, and you know it’s true.
But you know what, I hope it is a very good move for the illustrators and that the large following they get, allows them to further pursue their dreams. Good for them to not keep their eggs in the Twitter basket alone.
In the US some states have laws stating that recording conversations is not legal unless both parties consent.
I think that is silly but here we are.