You are dressing up moralism in Marxist language. Marxist materialism has fuck all to do with moral culpability, which is the topic at hand.

If you want to talk about the tactical utility of radicalizing current and former US soldiers, that is where a material analysis is useful. I’ll toss whatever ethical considerations aside if it means advancing the liberation of the global working class.

But trying to use surface-level Marxist language to minimize the moral responsibility of fascist foot soldiers is equally hilarious and disgusting.

Go command someone else around, fascist.

I’ve literally been homeless dumbass

Fuck off with your fascist apologia

The US military is primarily comprised of middle class people who chose to participate in the subjugation of people infinitely poorer than them, in order to preserve their cut of the imperial spoils. Poor people who happen to join are also just vying to be allowed to enter the imperialist-peripheral class.

The machine and its components are part of the same process. To pretend otherwise is idealism, elevating some imagined internal essence of each indivual above the function they serve in material processes.

Even in your fantasy of an “innocent” génicodaire who only participates for economic privileges rather than because they personally believe in the fascist project, they’re still selling out and killing their fellow workers for selfish benefit. The term for that is class traitor and they deserve no sympathy.

It’s a fucking wild fantasy too. “Hey I was only a concentration camp guard because it financially benefited me, I’m not a fascist the machine I work at is fascist”. Liberal nonsense

Contempt towards child killers isn’t misplaced

I’ll use duckai for fuzzy searches that are harder to find on modern search engines. Like anything I can’t summarize in a few keywords, it’s sometimes useful to have my query processed as language rather than keywords, basically. And modify the search with new expectations instead of different keywords.

It’ll still be confidently incorrect, so I’m usually just using it to find a source faster than it’d take me to peruse a couple pages of search results. Occasionally it’s been able to find some obscure shit that I otherwise would have given up on.

Being able to switch between different models is probably nice, although I haven’t used it enough to really notice much of a difference.

You used to be able to consistently get great results with " and - and similar operators, but for like a decade now I often just can’t find basic shit. I’d trade LLMs for peak search engines in a heartbeat. But since that’s not gonna happen I’ll use whichever tool works.