Huawei's upcoming flagship chip, built on innovative 3D IC stacking and the proprietary Tau Law, achieves performance parity with TSMC's 3nm process while bypassing EUV lithography constraints.
Funny how every year these claims are made and they never even come close. If they did it would be on many news sites, but it will come out, be benchmarked and fall significantly short of these claims. The world will move on and next year the same cycle will begin.
To be perfectly honest, I’d love to see someone actually challenge Apple on this front.
But I’ve been hearing the same shit year after year for like 15+ years. It would be good for the industry if the claims actually paned out for once. There’s no “coping” about it. Just simple truth…
I’ve already explained how this same argument was made about BYD, and that within a few years it leapfrogged the best western EVs. Exact same thing is happening with Huawei right now, except they literally just started doing this stuff only a few years ago when the heavy US export bans on chips started. Yet, within this very short period they already make phones that are functionally comparable to the best Android or iOS phones. While the hardware is a bit slower, it’s compensated for by a more lean software stack, and the end user experience is not actually all that different. That’s what I meant when I said you obviously have not used one. So, while Apple might have better specs on paper, it’s the entire stack and the end experience which actually matters. Now kindly gtfo with your own shit.
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]
This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.
Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.
Rules:
1: All Lemmy rules apply
2: Do not post low effort posts
3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff
4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.
5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)
6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist
7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed
Funny how every year these claims are made and they never even come close. If they did it would be on many news sites, but it will come out, be benchmarked and fall significantly short of these claims. The world will move on and next year the same cycle will begin.
That’s some adorable cope there. I’m old enough remember people making exactly same snide comments about BYD and Tesla a few years ago.
To be perfectly honest, I’d love to see someone actually challenge Apple on this front.
But I’ve been hearing the same shit year after year for like 15+ years. It would be good for the industry if the claims actually paned out for once. There’s no “coping” about it. Just simple truth…
the simple truth is that you haven’t actually used a modern Huawei phone
Okay?
I’ve played around with them but yeah haven’t committed to one as my daily. Why would this be relevant in the topic of conversation?
Performance claims, that can be measured and tested, are being made. These claims always fall short and if past is prologue, this will be the same.
Love how you can’t actually argue against what I’ve said and resort to saying “you’ve never used one” lmao gtfo of here with this shit.
I’ve already explained how this same argument was made about BYD, and that within a few years it leapfrogged the best western EVs. Exact same thing is happening with Huawei right now, except they literally just started doing this stuff only a few years ago when the heavy US export bans on chips started. Yet, within this very short period they already make phones that are functionally comparable to the best Android or iOS phones. While the hardware is a bit slower, it’s compensated for by a more lean software stack, and the end user experience is not actually all that different. That’s what I meant when I said you obviously have not used one. So, while Apple might have better specs on paper, it’s the entire stack and the end experience which actually matters. Now kindly gtfo with your own shit.