@PanArab@yogthos 20M units in China is too small to count as a rounding error.
When one Chinese phone company hired an American CEO he talked in interviews about how experimentally selling 50M units of a test prototype suggested it might have potential.
Right, but there’s nothing fundamentally wrong with AOSP. The key is not being reliant on any Google service. Base Android works fine as an operating system.
Most countries underestimated the importance of digital sovereignty. The only two countries that have viable alternative to US tech infrastructure are China and Russia.
China deployed alternatives to everything.
Alternatives to Nvidia AI chips, Volkswagen cars, TSMC chip foundries,
ASML lithography machines, ChatGPT AI software, F22 fighter jets.
And China has superior class solar panels, wind turbines, electric grids and batteries.
The EU has lithography machines that’s dependent on the US
and electric cars that are inferior to Tesla and those are their crown jewels.
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]
This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.
Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.
Rules:
1: All Lemmy rules apply
2: Do not post low effort posts
3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff
4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.
5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)
6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist
7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed
China did what Europe has failed to do; create a widely deployed alternative to Android and iPhoneOS.
@PanArab @yogthos 20M units in China is too small to count as a rounding error.
When one Chinese phone company hired an American CEO he talked in interviews about how experimentally selling 50M units of a test prototype suggested it might have potential.
In 10 months though and practically limited to the Chinese market? I think it is still an impressive figure.
Compare that with both Android and the iPhone which had global availability and took until 2010 to reach the same milestone.
Also worth noting that other companies have their own domestic operating systems as well. For example, Xiaomi made HyperOS.
HyperOS seems to be where HarmonyOS was pre NEXT. Heavily based on AOSP with Google Play Services, yet can also be had with other kernels.
Right, but there’s nothing fundamentally wrong with AOSP. The key is not being reliant on any Google service. Base Android works fine as an operating system.
Most countries underestimated the importance of digital sovereignty. The only two countries that have viable alternative to US tech infrastructure are China and Russia.
China deployed alternatives to everything.
Alternatives to Nvidia AI chips, Volkswagen cars, TSMC chip foundries,
ASML lithography machines, ChatGPT AI software, F22 fighter jets.
And China has superior class solar panels, wind turbines, electric grids and batteries.
The EU has lithography machines that’s dependent on the US
and electric cars that are inferior to Tesla and those are their crown jewels.
Not only did they outsource Europe but they’re running laps around America and Europe. It’s not even funny.