This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.
Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.
Rules:
1: All Lemmy rules apply
2: Do not post low effort posts
3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff
4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.
5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)
6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist
7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed
Truly the new opioid of the masses
100% this.
In my ed psych courses, I was left with the understanding that people pretty effectively filter out the stimuli that don’t actually benefit them. I can understand how a marketer would find this frustrating and go looking for something to blame.
These researchers are all marketers. While they may plausibly have expertise in some behavioral science domains, there’s no evidence that they’re qualified to address cognition. Where are the psychologists’ papers on this question?
Looks like the primary author has a PhD in psychology
I didn’t see which field his PhD is in. His research focus is consumer behavior.
https://www.mccombs.utexas.edu/faculty-and-research/faculty-directory/adrian-ward/
Second result when searching his name on Google.
Not in my search. Curious. Thanks.
Cognition is still not his research specialty according to his personal website and publication history (that I could find quickly), so I wouldn’t give as much weight to his opinion on it.
phone bad