Shoshana Strook, daughter of Israeli minister Orit Strook, alleged years of sexual and ritual abuse before her death, sparking online controversy and claims of information suppression.
A tragic story has emerged from northern Israel that combines shocking allegations, powerful families, and claims of online censorship. Shoshana Strook, 34, daughter of Israeli National Missions Minister Orit Strook, was found dead in her home after publicly accusing her parents and brother of sexual and ritual abuse dating back to her early childhood.
The claims, including alleged trafficking and involvement in so-called paedophile ceremonies, have ignited debates online as reports and social media posts appear to vanish from Google searches.
As her story spread online, users reported that news about Shoshana was being scrubbed or buried. Social media platforms and search engines appeared to remove or downrank posts, leading to speculation about deliberate censorship. Comments across forums highlighted comparisons to high-profile abuse cases elsewhere, pointing to elite networks and abuse cover-ups.
Yeah I will be writing extensively about that scandal on here in the coming weeks.
No I mean why would you implicitly doubt anyone else claiming this? Since this is the site for people who get mad about links without clicking them I can only assume that means limiting your investigation, not maintaining cautious skepticism while exploring their claims (since people literally have psychotic breaks and trauma damages memory).
also brb bad time to be posting lol. subject makes me shake with anger so probably good lmao
Because inventing satanic or other forms of ritualized sexual abuse to scare readers is a favorite pastime of mass media, politicians, and law enforcement.
Colloquially known satanic panics, the premier example of why you should be skeptical would be the McMartin preschool case.
But again, I think what we know about this person’s family, should rightfully override that healthy skepticism.
Lol I called it. Pathetic. Imagine thinking someone who reads about this hasn’t heard of that case. You haven’t read shit about it yet buddy. Welcome to the mailing list
You know literally zip about the media response to that case or the shitty books written about it. Fuck this site im coming back with nukes
I hope you go far with your uncritical belief in everything you read, in fact, you’ve inspired me to change.
Thanks to your valuable insight on the dangers of skepticism, I am no longer skeptical of the claims that Hamas used systemic rape and sexual violence on October 7th.
After all, I read that it occurred from multiple sources, and we all know how much many other Arab countries love there systemic sexual abuses and slavery, so thank you for opening my eyes to what my skepticism had prevented me from seeing clearly.
Because that is ultimately what your advocating for, whether you realize it or not.
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]
This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.
Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.
Rules:
1: All Lemmy rules apply
2: Do not post low effort posts
3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff
4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.
5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)
6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist
7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed
Yeah I will be writing extensively about that scandal on here in the coming weeks.
No I mean why would you implicitly doubt anyone else claiming this? Since this is the site for people who get mad about links without clicking them I can only assume that means limiting your investigation, not maintaining cautious skepticism while exploring their claims (since people literally have psychotic breaks and trauma damages memory).
also brb bad time to be posting lol. subject makes me shake with anger so probably good lmao
Because inventing satanic or other forms of ritualized sexual abuse to scare readers is a favorite pastime of mass media, politicians, and law enforcement.
Colloquially known satanic panics, the premier example of why you should be skeptical would be the McMartin preschool case.
But again, I think what we know about this person’s family, should rightfully override that healthy skepticism.
Lol I called it. Pathetic. Imagine thinking someone who reads about this hasn’t heard of that case. You haven’t read shit about it yet buddy. Welcome to the mailing list
You know literally zip about the media response to that case or the shitty books written about it. Fuck this site im coming back with nukes
I hope you go far with your uncritical belief in everything you read, in fact, you’ve inspired me to change.
Thanks to your valuable insight on the dangers of skepticism, I am no longer skeptical of the claims that Hamas used systemic rape and sexual violence on October 7th.
After all, I read that it occurred from multiple sources, and we all know how much many other Arab countries love there systemic sexual abuses and slavery, so thank you for opening my eyes to what my skepticism had prevented me from seeing clearly.
Because that is ultimately what your advocating for, whether you realize it or not.