The fact that you consider it so black and white tells me you aren’t thinking critically. Yes, the patent system can and has been abused over its long life. Literally every legal system has and will be. That’s how it goes. The struggle is how to come up with a system that minimizes the loopholes while not entirely crippling the things they are intended to protect.
Without some protections on human creations you end up with a war of who can steal the most ideas vice who can make the new best thing. You end up putting resources toward protecting your ideas and keeping them entirely secret, which arguably is worse than a public patent everyone can review and be inspired by.
I’m not arguing that they have no downsides, I’m arguing that the position of “it’s all bad, get rid of it” is reductive, at best.
The struggle is how to come up with a system that minimizes the loopholes while not entirely crippling the things they are intended to protect.
the “things they are intended to protect” is profits for the rich.
The fact that you consider it so black and white
it is black and white. the patent system is a capitalist invention with no benefit to society.
Without some protections on human creations you end up with a war of who can steal the most ideas
you can’t “steal” ideas any more than you can copyright them. you think that just because you signed some piece of paper, that nobody else can come along and do it anyway? as a pirate who “steals” all media and video games they consume, let me be the first to tell you that you are out of your mind. the only thing enforcing patents is the monopoly the government has on violence. the same government whose police force started as slave catchers. the same government that refuses to charge the rich and powerful from the Trump-Epstein list. patents exist to protect the profits of the rich and powerful, they do not exist to protect you.
You end up putting resources toward protecting your ideas and keeping them entirely secret
the patent system is no different than that. “your” ideas might not be secret, but nobody else can legally make use of them. there’s no practical difference. either way, the benefits those idea bring are restricted to the few people with enough money to purchase access to them.
I’m not arguing that they have no downsides, I’m arguing that the position of “it’s all bad, get rid of it” is reductive, at best.
that’s because you either don’t understand the basics of capitalism, or you defend it because it’s the only chains you’ve ever known. or you’re rich and pretending you’re not.
whatever the case, anyone who has a patent is a leech on society, and all patent holders should be hanged by the neck until dead. when we said “eat the rich”, what we mean is kill them all. sorry if that bit confused you.
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]
Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)
Posts.
News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
No humor/memes etc…
No affiliate links
No advertising.
No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
No self promotion.
No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
No politics.
Comments.
No personal attacks.
Obey instance rules.
No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc…)
Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.
My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.
The fact that you consider it so black and white tells me you aren’t thinking critically. Yes, the patent system can and has been abused over its long life. Literally every legal system has and will be. That’s how it goes. The struggle is how to come up with a system that minimizes the loopholes while not entirely crippling the things they are intended to protect.
Without some protections on human creations you end up with a war of who can steal the most ideas vice who can make the new best thing. You end up putting resources toward protecting your ideas and keeping them entirely secret, which arguably is worse than a public patent everyone can review and be inspired by.
I’m not arguing that they have no downsides, I’m arguing that the position of “it’s all bad, get rid of it” is reductive, at best.
the “things they are intended to protect” is profits for the rich.
it is black and white. the patent system is a capitalist invention with no benefit to society.
you can’t “steal” ideas any more than you can copyright them. you think that just because you signed some piece of paper, that nobody else can come along and do it anyway? as a pirate who “steals” all media and video games they consume, let me be the first to tell you that you are out of your mind. the only thing enforcing patents is the monopoly the government has on violence. the same government whose police force started as slave catchers. the same government that refuses to charge the rich and powerful from the Trump-Epstein list. patents exist to protect the profits of the rich and powerful, they do not exist to protect you.
the patent system is no different than that. “your” ideas might not be secret, but nobody else can legally make use of them. there’s no practical difference. either way, the benefits those idea bring are restricted to the few people with enough money to purchase access to them.
that’s because you either don’t understand the basics of capitalism, or you defend it because it’s the only chains you’ve ever known. or you’re rich and pretending you’re not.
whatever the case, anyone who has a patent is a leech on society, and all patent holders should be hanged by the neck until dead. when we said “eat the rich”, what we mean is kill them all. sorry if that bit confused you.