The nonconsentual sexualised depiction is in and of itself abuse. Get that through your skull, you dense motherfucker. Revenge porn is abuse not necessarily because what it depicts is an act of abuse, but because the material itself is distributed in a manner that violates the consent of the person(s) depicted. Similarly, editing a child’s likeness into a pornographic context is CSAM. Making a machine do likewise is CSAM.
Doubling down this hard to say this isn’t actually abuse is a really bad look for you and atp I’m convinced that you’re a total creep. I’m sure others are, too.
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]
Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)
Posts.
News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
No humor/memes etc…
No affiliate links
No advertising.
No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
No self promotion.
No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
No politics.
Comments.
No personal attacks.
Obey instance rules.
No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc…)
Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.
My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.
And what if neither happened?
Dude, you’re just wrong. There seems to be a huge disconnect with you between what the law is. And what you want the law to be.
You are not allowed to take an image of someone, photoshop them naked, and distributed it. Period.
You are also not allowed to depict child sexual abuse. It doesn’t matter if it’s not real. It’s the depiction of CSA taking place that is illegal.
‘This too is a crime, but it’s a different crime.’
‘Why are you defending this?’
Wrong.
Depictions could somehow be twice as illegal as the real event, and they still wouldn’t be the same thing. It literally did not take place.
The nonconsentual sexualised depiction is in and of itself abuse. Get that through your skull, you dense motherfucker. Revenge porn is abuse not necessarily because what it depicts is an act of abuse, but because the material itself is distributed in a manner that violates the consent of the person(s) depicted. Similarly, editing a child’s likeness into a pornographic context is CSAM. Making a machine do likewise is CSAM.
Doubling down this hard to say this isn’t actually abuse is a really bad look for you and atp I’m convinced that you’re a total creep. I’m sure others are, too.