"Firms don't appear to be replacing workers with AI on a significant scale," the firm said. It suspects some are trying to "dress up layoffs" as good news.

Firms are trying to dress up layoffs as a good news story rather than bad news as attributing staff reductions to AI adoption conveys a more positive message to investors.

manxu
link
fedilink
English
2212h

I wish. They are simply doing layoffs because investors ask why they haven’t, yet, since everyone else has done them. Has the CEO not done AI enough? Is he (theoretical possibility: she) behind the times? Shouldn’t all the investment in AI not finally pay off in RIFs?

We need AI NOW! And we need AI layoffs NOW! It’s the season, it’s the fashion.

In the ancient days, they said “You can’t get fired for picking IBM.” Nowadays, a CEO can’t get fired anyway, but there is a huge incentive to pile on another “AI initiative.”

Create a post

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

  • 1 user online
  • 11 users / day
  • 111 users / week
  • 305 users / month
  • 1.34K users / 6 months
  • 1 subscriber
  • 4.54K Posts
  • 50.5K Comments
  • Modlog