There you go. You’re stating your own opinion instead of following capitalism’s laws like a sheep. I’m happy now.

I think Fallout London adds more to the game and was wanted by more people. Democracy and utility seem to be agreed on this case, and those are the two measures I use to determine importance.

No. Importance is a metaphysical construct, not a legal one.

Because you said what they say is important is more important. That sounds like a subjective opinion to me, not an interpretation of the law.

Why are you using a state’s laws to determine your own sense of morality?

I disagree with the fundamental assertion that software can be owned

I disagree with the fundamental assertion that work is more important when it’s paid.