This is all local though, thus encouraging everyone to get their own GPU. Wouldn’t that work against the goal of getting more people on their cloud services?
I haven’t looked into DLSS 5 but previous versions required lots of compute to train a model for each specific title, additionally Microsoft and Nvidia may have certain agreements to further the adoption of AI processors that could be used for data harvesting features like Microsoft recall
Nvidia is a company that sells chips
Microsoft is a company better on the future of software running on those chips
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]
No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
No Let’s Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates.
(Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources.
If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)
How would Microsoft benefit from this? I thought they were mainly in the LLM and user information hoarding business.
Ecosystem growth, sales of Azure AI compute power
This is all local though, thus encouraging everyone to get their own GPU. Wouldn’t that work against the goal of getting more people on their cloud services?
I haven’t looked into DLSS 5 but previous versions required lots of compute to train a model for each specific title, additionally Microsoft and Nvidia may have certain agreements to further the adoption of AI processors that could be used for data harvesting features like Microsoft recall
Nvidia is a company that sells chips
Microsoft is a company better on the future of software running on those chips
It’s a big conflict of interest