“characteristic of or relating to a class or group of things; not specific.”
Ship building alone is very specific, there are very little games that let you truly customize the entirety of the layout on your ship. On top of that, the crazy about of realism that goes into that is insane. Everything can affect something else in that. I’m also a huge fan of the procedural planets, like dozens of them, which what super disappointed me was walking for what felt like daaayyyss across a map.
So again, the concept was great, the execution was not.
Well, I’m celebrating mother’s day today, so I wasn’t going to even have my phone out, but since I am pooping let’s talk ‘mechanics’ LMAO.
So you’re pretending now that mechanics aren’t part of a game’s identity? That’s adorable.
Listen, kiddo, game concepts aren’t just the napkin pitch like ‘space adventure with guns.’
That’s like saying a restaurant concept is just ‘we serve food.’ 💀😂
The execution of those ideas, how deep the systems go, how player agency is handled, the SCOPE of what you can do, is the process of a concept.
Mechanics are the embodiment of concept. Otherwise, every shooter is just ‘point and click,’ and every RPG is just ‘talk and fight.’ You have to look at the HOW, not just the what.
Cheers mate, glad you have a perspective on it. Take care!
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]
Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.
By the literal definition.
“characteristic of or relating to a class or group of things; not specific.”
Ship building alone is very specific, there are very little games that let you truly customize the entirety of the layout on your ship. On top of that, the crazy about of realism that goes into that is insane. Everything can affect something else in that. I’m also a huge fan of the procedural planets, like dozens of them, which what super disappointed me was walking for what felt like daaayyyss across a map.
So again, the concept was great, the execution was not.
You’re describing mechanics not a concept.
Well, I’m celebrating mother’s day today, so I wasn’t going to even have my phone out, but since I am pooping let’s talk ‘mechanics’ LMAO.
So you’re pretending now that mechanics aren’t part of a game’s identity? That’s adorable.
Listen, kiddo, game concepts aren’t just the napkin pitch like ‘space adventure with guns.’
That’s like saying a restaurant concept is just ‘we serve food.’ 💀😂
The execution of those ideas, how deep the systems go, how player agency is handled, the SCOPE of what you can do, is the process of a concept.
Mechanics are the embodiment of concept. Otherwise, every shooter is just ‘point and click,’ and every RPG is just ‘talk and fight.’ You have to look at the HOW, not just the what.
Cheers mate, glad you have a perspective on it. Take care!
It’s hard to tell if you actually are making a coherent counter argument here since your response is 90% ad homenem.
Concepts are high level ideas. Mechanics are lower level implementations of those ideas.
But I think the original poster really meant “vision” or “motif” more than they meant “concept”.
A game with lots of deep mechanics but lacking overall vision is really just seen as a fancy tech demo by most people.