Their incentive is money. All this is teaching them is that they need to find a different approach to do the same thing.

The AAA outfits are trash and should die.

Bad reviews tend to lead to worse sales…

Sorry, the argument is they should have zero consequences for trying something reviled because they abandoned it later? And that will make them not try similar things later, because of reasons?

The “argument” is that a few people said people should reward them doing the right thing eventually but others somehow think that’s evil or some weird ass shit.

It’s not complicated, as much as Internet weirdos want it to be

They are being rewarded for doing the right thing simply by people not continuing to refund.

@[email protected]
link
fedilink
0
edit-2
8M

Ok it’s just weird to me that people like you have some moral objection to a slightly different attitude applied to reviews. It’s not something worth talking about.

Nobody cares what attitude to apply to reviews. You decided to have a conversation. You don’t have to continue it.

Create a post

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let’s Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)
  • 1 user online
  • 64 users / day
  • 328 users / week
  • 848 users / month
  • 3.13K users / 6 months
  • 1 subscriber
  • 4.49K Posts
  • 28.9K Comments
  • Modlog