I think it means the same thing sprinkled with some poor communication. In the article they’re adding that you can’t make a 4th game if it was supposed to be a trilogy.
Which means in the context of the story the “4th” game is a new game in the same universe.
I get what you mean tho. Maybe it shluldn’t be called Witcher 4 anymore. However from business perspective it would makes sense to use a well-established brand name.
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]
Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)
Posts.
News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
No humor/memes etc…
No affiliate links
No advertising.
No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
No self promotion.
No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
No politics.
Comments.
No personal attacks.
Obey instance rules.
No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc…)
Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.
My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.
https://www.thegamer.com/cd-projekt-red-confirms-no-witcher-4/
That’s what I was referring to, but yeah, maybe it was just that they couldn’t carry on with the same storyline.
I think it means the same thing sprinkled with some poor communication. In the article they’re adding that you can’t make a 4th game if it was supposed to be a trilogy.
Which means in the context of the story the “4th” game is a new game in the same universe.
I get what you mean tho. Maybe it shluldn’t be called Witcher 4 anymore. However from business perspective it would makes sense to use a well-established brand name.